Home > On-Demand Archives > Q&A Sessions >

Live Q&A - Linux on RISC-V

Drew Fustini - Watch Now - Duration: 21:27

Live Q&A - Linux on RISC-V
Drew Fustini
Live Q&A with Drew Fustini for the theatre talk titled Linux on RISC-V
italicssurround text with
boldsurround text with
**two asterisks**
or just a bare URL
surround text with
strikethroughsurround text with
~~two tilde characters~~
prefix with

Score: 0 | 1 year ago | 1 reply

Thank you for your talk! It sounds like RISC-V is working well for Western Digital and NVIDIA and others. Do you think we'll see even bigger companies shift to RISC-V? If not, what do you see as the main reasons that they would keeping an expensive license with Arm, for example?

Score: 0 | 1 year ago | no reply

Hello, I think we will see more and more silicon vendors have at least some involvement in RISC-V. Samsung has talked about how it is using RISC-V in its 5G mobile RF and AI image sensors (https://www.anandtech.com/show/15228/samsung-to-use-riscv-cores). Intel has a new RISC-V initiative (https://riscv.org/news/2022/02/intel-corporation-makes-deep-investment-in-risc-v-community-to-accelerate-innovation-in-open-computing/) as well. Renesas is a major processor manufacturer for automotive and they have announced a RISC-V SoC (https://www.renesas.com/tw/en/about/press-room/renesas-pioneers-risc-v-technology-rzfive-general-purpose-mpus-based-64-bit-risc-v-cpu-core). It remains to be seen how long it will take for RISC-V implementations to be on par with Arm or even AMD/Intel in terms of high performance for generic workloads. For now, RISC-V is really shining in embedded use cases and also specific niches like machine learning accelerators like the Esperanto ET-SoC-1 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmUu-lN7D0k).

Score: 0 | 1 year ago | no reply

That was enlightening. Thanks.

Score: 0 | 1 year ago | no reply

Great talk, thank you!

Score: 0 | 1 year ago | 2 replies

We have the wrong slides :(

Score: 0 | 1 year ago | no reply

Should be fixed now.

Score: 0 | 1 year ago | no reply

Indeed! Let me fix this.

17:06:39	 From  Erwin : So compared to current proprietary architectures RISC-V is still work in Progress and leaves much to the implementer?
17:10:38	 From  j. redpath : ?
17:11:00	 From  Max Maxfield : Hi JR
17:11:46	 From  Erwin : thanks, for the answer
17:15:31	 From  j. redpath : I have a question about OOM risc-v, thanks Drew
17:16:03	 From  j. redpath : @max hello back !
17:22:30	 From  Jay Cosper : thanks for the talk!
17:22:39	 From  Drew Fustini : thanks all!